Home

Election Reform Network

Top Menu

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • What We Stand For
  • Achievements
  • Contact Us
  • Forum

Campaign Finance Reform + Candidate Pledge + Court Cases + Montco Election Problems + Emergency Ballots + Featured + Federal legialation + Holt Bill 2009 + State Legislation + Key Studies on Vote Machines + Montco Election '07 + Voter Registration Reform + Reports and studies + Reports on Election Administration + Sequoia Machine Blues + Who Elects the President? + Why Do We elect Judges?

Tell The Inquirer: Election Problems Go Deeper Than One Precinct

Submitted by Steve Strahs on February 25, 2010 - 11:06am
  • Montco Election Problems

A federal law suit seeking redress against the Chester County Election Board for practices that resulted in unconscionably long lines and as much as a day-long wait to vote at a poll near Lincoln University back in the November 08 election has - thankfully - put election administration back in the spotlight for a minor media moment.  The Inquirer recently ran a piece by columnist Mark Bowden on the incident entitled "Indefensible."   Why not tell The Inquirer at inquirer.letters@phillynews.com that the issue is much bigger than one egregious precinct in Chester County?

  • Add new comment
  • Read more
  • Share/Save

Starting the U-turn on Corporate Political "Free Speech" Nationally and Moving Ahead with Campaign Finance Reform in Pennsylvania

Submitted by Steve Strahs on February 10, 2010 - 4:43pm
  • Campaign Finance Reform

Last week seems to have been "take-off" time for the movement for national campaign finance reform in the wake of the Supreme Court's Citizens United  corporate "free speech" decision.  Here's a quick run-down.

  • Add new comment
  • Read more
  • Share/Save

A Populist Moment for Campaign Finance Reform in PA

Submitted by Steve Strahs on January 29, 2010 - 1:26pm
  • Campaign Finance Reform
Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne is onto something.  He asserts that "we have reached a true populist moment in American politics." The U.S. Supreme Court majority sniffed last week that the lure of campaign cash has nothing to do with the likelihood of public corruption or undue influence on our institutions and public officials.  It's just that corporations have the right to free speech (even without a mention of them in the constitution).  And if the result is a torrent of corporate dollars contaminating the political process, which doesn't exactly pass the sniff test as it is, we can all pay homage to the glories of the first amendment.
 
Maybe the Supremes missed the health care reform stalemate in Congress.  Health insurers and HMOs spent nationally more than $126 million in the first half of 2009 alone on campaign contributions and lobbying to fight health care reform. That's a clip of nearly $700,000 per day.

And they undoubtedly glanced over Pennsylvania's recent state budget fiasco.  Last year the interests that blocked adequate revenue from reaching the state's coffers were many, but they all had one thing in common: big bucks "invested" politically.  Want to tax the natural gas extracted from the Marcellus Shale?  You say it's a no-brainer from a policy perspective.  Sorry.  Governor Rendell backed away and the legislature ran for cover – maybe next year.  The gas industry recently showered state senate leaders with more than $200,000 in campaign contributions and the governor was rewarded, too (all before the fact) . 

 
Disgusted? Let's get the ball rolling on campaign finance reform in PA.  Click here to sign a citizens' petition to help get this issue some visibility in our state.
  • Add new comment
  • Read more
  • Share/Save

End the Mad Dash for Political Cash

Submitted by Steve Strahs on January 25, 2010 - 2:40pm
  • Campaign Finance Reform

Sign the Petition for Real Campaign Finance Reform

Want to fix government so it works for everybody?  Short of a magic wand, here’s the closest thing available  – and it cuts across every imaginable issue from health care to education to jobs and a decent budget: limiting the influence of big money on the political process.  To learn more and sign on to a petition calling for essential campaign contribution limits based on an excellent bill now in the hopper in Harrisburg, click here.

  • Read more
  • Share/Save

With Sparse Turnout, Problems Persisted at the Polls Last Election Day

Submitted by Steve Strahs on December 15, 2009 - 3:02pm
  • Reports on Election Administration

This past election day (Nov. 3, 09) voters avoided the polls in droves, yet there were the usual procedural problems and occasional confusion in an otherwise lackluster voting day.     
 
Only 25 percent of eligible voters turned out in Montgomery County, but that compared favorably with Philadelphia’s abysmal turnout of 12 percent and the statewide figure of 20 percent.  While the 2005 municipal election also generated a countywide turnout in Montco of 25 percent, that election lacked the high court races that were supposed to drive voter participation this time around.

  • Read more
  • Share/Save

How Did We Judge Them?

Submitted by Steve Strahs on November 9, 2009 - 3:46pm
  • Why Do We elect Judges?

There went the judges.  They were all over the ballot last Tuesday – Pennsylvania Supreme Court (one seat), Superior Court (four seats), Commonwealth Court (two seats), Court of Common Pleas (in Montco, seven races).  Then there are the “retentions” (one for Superior Court and one for Commonwealth Court; the ballot for local judges varies, depending on your county).   Picking judges is a pretty ho-hum affair, but not this year, when two juvenile court justices in Luzerne County put the workings of the judiciary on trial.  Yet voter turnout was still barely visible at 20 percent statewide.  Why?  The problem goes way beyond an apathetic electorate.

  • Read more
  • Share/Save

Petition Our Pennsylvania State Legislators for Campaign Finance Reform

  • Campaign Finance Reform

Background:

There is no single factor that undermines our democracy more than the influence of big money. Curbs should be put in place, not because our candidates and officials lack integrity, but because the race for campaign cash forces priorities and practices within our system of elections that collide with the very essence of democracy.

  • Go to form
  • Share/Save

Citizen Testimony on Election Problems Meets Deaf Ears of Montco Officials

Submitted by Steve Strahs on September 25, 2009 - 1:18pm
  • Montco Election Problems

The Election Reform Network presented the dark side of Election Day administration at a meeting of the Montco Board of Commissioners on September 17.  Appropriately enough, it was Constitution Day. 

Five citizen advocates described a series of incidents and practices that occurred last November 4 at the polls across Montgomery County.  We read a legal affidavit from a poll watcher/attorney describing intimidation at the polls and eyewitness testimony to a senseless incident of a legitimate vote being purposely canceled by a judge of elections.  We presented eyewitness testimony of unlawful and unjust policies on provisional and emergency paper ballots and voter ID requirements.

  • Read more
  • Share/Save

ACLU Files ACORN Law Suit Challenging Constitutionality of Pennsylvania Voter-Registration Law

Submitted by Steve Strahs on August 7, 2009 - 1:15pm
  • Voter Registration Reform

In a press release dated July 22, 2009, The American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania made the following announcement:

PITTSBURGH - The American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania and Project Vote filed a lawsuit today on behalf of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), a community organization comprising more than 20,000 working families in Pennsylvania that utilizes voter-engagement strategies, like voter-registration campaigns, as part of its work to strengthen low- and moderate-income communities.  The lawsuit charges that a Pennsylvania law unconstitutionally restricts ACORN's right to conduct voter-registration drives by effectively prohibiting it from using paid canvassers.

  • Read more
  • Share/Save

National Study Mirrors Flaws in Montco Election Administration

Submitted by Steve Strahs on July 28, 2009 - 5:29pm
  • Montco Election Problems
  • Reports on Election Administration
  • Reports and studies

For far too many voters, as their hotline calls attest, voting is a frustration-filled, even confrontational process where well-meaning, eligible citizens are being denied the legal right to vote.

“Yes, my name is Clinton [J.], and my wife, Madelyn [J.], here in Royersford, Pennsylvania is not registered. Now, she voted in the last presidential election in 2004 and, for some reason, her name did not appear on this list here in Royersford. So I’m just wondering exactly what the deal is. We did check online before the end of voter registration and she was registered, but now she’s not registered.” Montgomery County, Pennsylvania

  • Add new comment
  • Read more
  • Share/Save
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • next ›
  • last »

Navigation

  • Discussion Forum
  • Contents
    • Montco Election Problems
    • Sequoia Machine Blues
    • Emergency Ballots
    • Reports and studies
      • Reports on Election Administration
      • Key Studies on Vote Machines
    • Campaign Finance Reform
    • Court Cases
    • Voter Registration Reform
    • State Legislation
    • Why Do We elect Judges?

Contribute!

We can't do what we do without your help!

Printing, postage, travel to meetings, research, it all costs money. Won't you please help protect your vote by clicking the PayPal logo and making a small donation via our secure PayPal page? You don't need a PayPal account to pay by credit card.

Thanks for your help!

electionreformnetwork.us is owned and operated by
Stephen Strahs of Melrose Park, PA
©2008-2010
This Drupal Powered Website
Is built and managed by
Wyndhound Online Communities
with help from
RoopleTheme